Nobikage San

Introducing

Yuma AI Pricing Explained: What You’re Really Paying for in 2025

Yuma AI pricing can look simple — until your support volume spikes. Learn how its pay-per-resolution model really works.

If you’re here, you’re probably interested in integrating Yuma AI into your eCommerce but need more information about its pricing model.

Yuma AI stands out for its “performance-based” pricing. That means you only pay for what you use. Or at least, in this article, they claim to have switched to this performance model.

But when you visit their website, there isn’t much information available.

So, how much does Yuma AI actually cost? Is it truly a performance-based system, or do they offer pricing plans like other AI tools?

Let’s dive in.

Yuma AI pricing plans

If you read the article, you’ll find the following Yuma AI pricing details:

Plan ResolutionsPrice per Month
500 resolutions$350/month
1,000 resolutions$650/month
1,500 resolutions$900/month
EnterpriseCustom Pricing

This model is great for small stores that are just starting out because it’s low-risk: they only pay based on the outcomes.

On the other hand, high-volume eCommerce brands might end up paying much more than with a fixed-plan model.

But wait, that’s what they claim in the article, yet if you check [Yuma AI’s pricing page](Yuma | pricing), you won’t find any information.

Why Yuma AI doesn’t show pricing information on their website

That’s actually pretty common in SaaS.

Most brands do it to start a conversation. Instead of showing fixed numbers, they want to understand your business first and then offer a plan that fits your size, ticket volume, and goals.

That’s not necessarily a bad thing. As long as they deliver what they promise in their article, the model remains transparent.

Still, when you talk to them, have a clear idea of what similar tools cost. Knowing the typical price range helps you negotiate more confidently and make sure the deal makes sense for your store.

Benefits of Yuma AI’s pricing model

Low-risk entry

If you’re exploring AI for the first time, this model feels like a safe starting point. You only pay when Yuma AI actually resolves a ticket, so there’s no big upfront cost or long-term commitment. It lets you test automation, see how it performs, and scale once you start seeing results.

Value-based spending

This pricing connects your cost directly to performance. Instead of paying for user seats or fixed plans, you pay for outcomes. Every resolved ticket means the AI did real work for your team. That link between results and cost gives a sense of fairness that many flat-rate models don’t offer.

Flexible for small stores

If your ticket volume is still low or your store is just getting started, this setup can be budget-friendly. You’re not forced into an expensive plan that doesn’t match your scale. You can grow into it naturally as your orders and support needs increase.

Limitations of Yuma AI’s pricing model

Unpredictable costs

When your ticket volume changes, your bill changes too. During busy moments like sales, product launches, or shipping delays, you might see your support costs double. That unpredictability makes financial planning tricky, especially for teams that need to report consistent monthly numbers.

Difficult to forecast budgets

Since your spending depends entirely on the number of tickets the AI resolves, setting a clear budget becomes tough. You can’t easily predict next quarter’s support expenses, and that can affect planning for other areas like hiring or marketing.

Success penalty

In theory, paying for success sounds great. But as your business grows, that success can come at a higher price. More sales usually mean more customer inquiries — and more resolutions to pay for. You could end up spending more simply because your store is performing well

Vague definition of “resolved”

One of the gray areas in this model is what Yuma AI considers a “successful resolution.” If a ticket is auto-closed or answered with a generic response, it might still count as resolved. That can lead to paying for interactions that didn’t fully satisfy your customers.

How to test the profitability of Yuma AI’s pricing model

Before jumping in, you need to know if Yuma AI’s performance-based pricing will actually save you money — or just move costs around. 

You can figure that out with a few simple steps:

Gather your past support data

Start by exporting data from your help desk (like Gorgias, Zendesk, or Freshdesk). You’ll need at least three months of tickets, ideally segmented by type: order status, returns, refunds, and general questions.

Estimate your automation potential

Look at how many of those tickets are repetitive and follow a clear pattern. These are the ones Yuma AI could likely automate. For example, if 60% of your tickets are “Where is my order?” messages, assume that portion could be handled by the AI.

Apply Yuma AI’s pricing tiers

Use the plans mentioned in their article or any reference rates (like $350 for 500 resolutions, $650 for 1,000, etc.). Multiply your estimated “automatable tickets” by those rates to see how much you’d pay per month.

Compare it with your current costs

Calculate how much those same tickets currently cost you in human time. For instance, if an agent costs €3,000/month and resolves 1,200 tickets, each resolution costs about €2.50. Compare that with Yuma AI’s cost per resolution (e.g., $0.65–$0.70).

Include indirect savings

AI doesn’t just reduce direct labor costs. It shortens response time, increases agent availability, and improves customer experience. Try to assign a rough value to those benefits when calculating ROI.

Run a “what-if” scenario

Simulate different months — one normal, one peak (like Black Friday), and one low-volume. This helps you see how the variable pricing might behave under real business conditions.

Estimate your ROI

Finally, compare the total monthly AI cost against your current team cost for the same ticket volume. If Yuma AI’s cost per resolution is consistently lower and scales well, the model is profitable for you. If it spikes unpredictably, you’ll know it’s risky before committing.

Why Minami AI fits better for growing eCommerce brands

Yuma AI’s pricing might seem fair at first, but it scales against you.

As your ticket volume grows, so does your bill. What starts as a performance-based advantage quickly turns into a cost that limits your growth.

Minami AI works differently. It uses a fixed pricing model with no hidden fees, no usage limits, and no penalties for success. You know exactly what you’ll pay each month.

Besides that, Minami AI isn’t just about replying faster. It delivers complete automation across your entire post-purchase experience. It doesn’t stop at answering questions, it also takes real actions: processing returns, managing exchanges, triggering re-shipments, updating carriers, and sending delivery notifications automatically.

See Minami in action. Book a demo.

Frequently Asked Questions

Have more questions? Fill this form and our team will be in touch to answer them!

How can I know if Yuma AI’s pricing will stay profitable when my ticket volume changes?

To find out, use your past support data. Check how your ticket numbers behaved during campaigns or peak seasons, and apply Yuma’s per-resolution rates. That quick calculation shows if the model would still make sense when your volume spikes.

What can I do to avoid paying for low-quality “AI resolutions”?

Ask Yuma AI to clarify what they count as a “resolved” ticket before signing up. During testing, track customer satisfaction and reopened tickets. If many “resolved” cases still require human help, you’ll know you’re not getting full value for what you pay.

Get Started

Minami is available with zero setup

No integrations. No workflows. No dev time. Just power up Minami and let your AI agent cut refunds, manual labor, and losses